Pakistan has slipped one position in the latest Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2025, ranking 145th out of 180 countries, with a score of 28, transparency watchdog Transparency International announced Tuesday.
The annual index ranks countries based on perceived levels of public sector corruption, using expert assessments and business surveys. A lower score indicates higher perceived corruption.
CPI 2025: Pakistan’s Position and Score
With a CPI score of 28, Pakistan’s ranking fell from 144th to 145th compared to the previous year’s report. Countries scoring below 50 are generally seen as having significant corruption challenges, while those scoring above 70 are perceived as cleaner.
Transparency International noted that global progress against corruption remains slow, with only a few countries showing significant improvements. Countries leading the index, such as Denmark, Finland, and New Zealand, continue to set benchmarks with scores above 80.
Regional Comparison
Among South Asian peers, Pakistan trails behind countries like Sri Lanka and India, which have slightly higher CPI scores. Observers say the gap reflects persistent governance weaknesses and challenges in enforcing accountability across public institutions.
Experts highlight that inconsistent enforcement of anti-corruption laws and lack of transparency in public sector contracts continue to weigh on Pakistan’s CPI performance.
Government Response
Responding to the latest CPI ranking, government officials acknowledged the need for stronger anti-corruption measures but urged caution in over-interpreting the index as a complete reflection of all governance reforms underway.
A senior official at the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) said Pakistan has initiated several campaigns targeting financial crime and misuse of authority, but institutional reforms often take time to reflect in global rankings.
What the CPI Means for Pakistan
The Corruption Perceptions Index is widely used by international investors and policymakers to gauge the business environment and governance quality in different countries. A low ranking can have implications for foreign direct investment (FDI), credit ratings, and Pakistan’s image in global markets.
Civil society activists say the drop in ranking underscores the urgency for structural reforms in public procurement, judicial processes, and political financing. They argue that without measurable improvements in accountability and transparency, Pakistan’s CPI position is unlikely to improve.
Way Forward
Analysts recommend a combination of legislative action, digital governance tools, and independent oversight to strengthen anti-corruption efforts. Transparency advocates also urge the government to engage with media and civil society to build broader support for reform.
